Skip to main content

Overcoming Ek Thali ke Chatte Batte (Chips of the Same block)

 
Image From: www.imohitkamboj.com




We are still quoting from history, most certainly of the facts that lie before us. Examine the situation pre-1947 August. Increased freedom activism on many fronts, primarily the Congress which was secular yet classified as Hindu dominion and the other, the Muslim League led by Jinnah. 

The major divide came through centuries, both slaved or ruled by Hindu and Muslim kings, the Muslims discovered their partial identity when the Britishers decided to rule them based on their religion. A very inefficient and biased form of governance which was based on profit. There was no ideology other than serving to the Queen of England. Much like the school curriculum divided for different age groups, the people of India as citizens of many other countries being a different front, they used the policy of divide and rule. This led to consciousness but not qualifying in terms of secularism or even a separate country because they misjudged themselves as a new identity over a century.

The Muslim invaders who came from as far as Arab world, Persia, Iran and Turkey could not further define or state their ideological definition yet their present identity was unformed without the specification of role of united India as their motherland. This is inclusive of living, working, doing business, serving and being in harmony with other sections of society. What Jinnah did was unfortunate.

Today, we compulsively fight many wars both in real sense and philosophically with Pakistan over continued efforts by terrorists to claim Kashmir or to ensue seeds of hatred among Indian Muslims. No wonder, we also continually spew the venom on the political leaders who are able to lead the Hindu fraction in some direction while there were hints of friction between Muslims and Hindus. This is a direct observation in relation to Mr. Narendra Modi, the future prime-ministerial candidate from BJP.

This political leader has fought through our constant questioning of secularism while in different part of country, there are sometimes incidents of violence between the two sectarians. Jinnah was not a strong leader or may be he did not had a strong backing of supporters who could follow him, if he chose to determine a different fate. To be a strong leader is to be Mahatma Gandhi who sacrificed his life and his efforts remain undisputed even in the matters of partition because he tried to convince Jinnah and then the public with his unending fasts.

We might not have any expectation other than scare of another ugly event where the government may fail to check the unruly civilians from both the sides when the issues closer will rise up. The truth is that the Congress is unable to judge him as an efficient political leader who can make the people anywhere believe in issues of more wide interest and benefit. It could be about rural development, no racial discrimination or national security. He dominated the election scenario with extensive insights.

Could be we have more dynamic debates, so that we could ask the next Jinnah to stop pressurizing under some doctrine that is not wrong in its entirety being already established as a different country but yet, not at the expense of the billions significant of this country. 
 
  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Again the Sky

First published on Literary journal.

Today showered again the sky I wondered if soaking the streets I choose to ignore.
Small leaves sprout and crawl inside me, branches spread out, straws are collected nests are created.
Lone pathway on feet speck of air or earth so full, and my own heart's silence in this moment's time.

Has Always Been

First Published on Poem Hunter

Once wide open
does seems the world is
riding on breeze
for a moment of thought

my pen is pouring
celebration of life, an afterthought
in own musing of ideas
where a tear is no longer a fear
nothing devises as found in

eternal or has always been.

Open-Ended Questions and Advaita Vedanta

What we decipher through eyes could almost be a truth but is there need to confirm to everything. Prior to internet the world we lived in, we exchanged information in professional spheres. Social life was largely restricted in community sense. The cyberspace is today filled with ambiguous energy yet we are associating in new manner of extended social life on basis of interests, hobbies, etc.  Knowledge as we know of now has changed in its meaning and deliverance. As we are exposed, many open-ended questions arise. Knowledge is a continuing factor and when it persists we understand that we should and can avoid further difficulties. Thus these open-ended questions about world chaos, social indiscipline, issues like pollution, gender equality/parity become a consolatory afterthought. What should we be doing next? There are no active and legalized platforms where we can share and elucidate on various thought-provoking scenarios. Importantly when we find a case related to these scenarios …