Skip to main content

Overcoming Ek Thali ke Chatte Batte (Chips of the Same block)

 
Image From: www.imohitkamboj.com




We are still quoting from history, most certainly of the facts that lie before us. Examine the situation pre-1947 August. Increased freedom activism on many fronts, primarily the Congress which was secular yet classified as Hindu dominion and the other, the Muslim League led by Jinnah. 

The major divide came through centuries, both slaved or ruled by Hindu and Muslim kings, the Muslims discovered their partial identity when the Britishers decided to rule them based on their religion. A very inefficient and biased form of governance which was based on profit. There was no ideology other than serving to the Queen of England. Much like the school curriculum divided for different age groups, the people of India as citizens of many other countries being a different front, they used the policy of divide and rule. This led to consciousness but not qualifying in terms of secularism or even a separate country because they misjudged themselves as a new identity over a century.

The Muslim invaders who came from as far as Arab world, Persia, Iran and Turkey could not further define or state their ideological definition yet their present identity was unformed without the specification of role of united India as their motherland. This is inclusive of living, working, doing business, serving and being in harmony with other sections of society. What Jinnah did was unfortunate.

Today, we compulsively fight many wars both in real sense and philosophically with Pakistan over continued efforts by terrorists to claim Kashmir or to ensue seeds of hatred among Indian Muslims. No wonder, we also continually spew the venom on the political leaders who are able to lead the Hindu fraction in some direction while there were hints of friction between Muslims and Hindus. This is a direct observation in relation to Mr. Narendra Modi, the future prime-ministerial candidate from BJP.

This political leader has fought through our constant questioning of secularism while in different part of country, there are sometimes incidents of violence between the two sectarians. Jinnah was not a strong leader or may be he did not had a strong backing of supporters who could follow him, if he chose to determine a different fate. To be a strong leader is to be Mahatma Gandhi who sacrificed his life and his efforts remain undisputed even in the matters of partition because he tried to convince Jinnah and then the public with his unending fasts.

We might not have any expectation other than scare of another ugly event where the government may fail to check the unruly civilians from both the sides when the issues closer will rise up. The truth is that the Congress is unable to judge him as an efficient political leader who can make the people anywhere believe in issues of more wide interest and benefit. It could be about rural development, no racial discrimination or national security. He dominated the election scenario with extensive insights.

Could be we have more dynamic debates, so that we could ask the next Jinnah to stop pressurizing under some doctrine that is not wrong in its entirety being already established as a different country but yet, not at the expense of the billions significant of this country. 
 
  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Again the Sky

First published on Literary journal.

Today showered again the sky I wondered if soaking the streets I choose to ignore.
Small leaves sprout and crawl inside me, branches spread out, straws are collected nests are created.
Lone pathway on feet speck of air or earth so full, and my own heart's silence in this moment's time.

What You are - Defining it

When we are jostling with different questions regarding our social behavior for bigger issues such as women empowerment, social life, I ponder why there is such prejudice. Are we responsible? Not the absurdity to look down at any woman with constricted views of household or community values is deriding us of important decisions and self assertion. 

When in society be local or abroad, we confirm to certain beliefs. We carry with us certain traditions which are well respected and if not, can be collaborated with certain evidence that are acknowledged given a case. Certain new theories are often forming and laws are often modified to include the evolving practices anywhere for men and women alike.

Thus, what are these entities. Having an ideology such as Gandhism can help a humanitarian do job anywhere in the world. Confirming to professional etiquette, the diseases are easily diagnosed with exception of long-formed personal habits. Vast experience in certain field or valuable upbringing c…

Least Minimal Good for Better Future

We are out, now. In places, all over city, or country. We often notice when we are outside, how civic amenities are making life feasible. Five years back, it was not the case. There were definite office and public hours. Mobiles made communication possible, yet services were limited. One could not get proper bedding and food at hotels.

Even now, some most popular tourist spots have poor accommodation infrastructure. If the weather would unpredictable, we were often stranded in traffic. Some travel spots were limited to boys/men only. Transport was not superior as now when we can hire a cab to any location.

When the time has changed now, don't we find ourselves pointing out faults in people, system and places. Sometimes pinches us, like sight of garbage, movement of animals, display of election campaigns and ads.

I concur nothing can change by our will but we can change a little that can help inculcate our attitude and expectations from others.

We should contribute a little towards ge…